Rehabilitation needs after critical illness: Referral outcomes from a ICU follow up clinic in Northern Ireland

Introduction: In 2019/20 a total of 171,900 people were admitted to adult general intensive care units (ICU) across England, Wales and Northern Ireland, with a survival rate of 79.6% at hospital discharge.1 Patients who survive critical illness and admission to ICU often experience ICU-related long-term physical and non-physical impairments and disability following hospital discharge.2 National guidance advocates multidisciplinary team (MDT) follow up to identify and manage the unmet health needs of this patient population.3-4 The UK has seen an increase in the number of follow up services available in the last 7 years.2 The Covid-19 pandemic further highlighted the need to provide this service, locally resulting in the establishment of the Belfast Health and Social Care Trust (BHSCT) ICU follow up clinic in July 2020. The follow up clinic is offered to patients aged = 18 years, an ICU length of stay of = 4 days, who have been discharged from an inpatient setting within the last 12 weeks and do not receive follow up from any other established care pathway. The clinic consists of an ICU Nurse, Doctor, Clinical Psychologist and Physiotherapist. Patients are offered either a virtual, face-to-face or telephone appointment. Objective(s): To identify unmet rehabilitation needs and onward referral requirements of patients presenting at an ICU follow-up clinic in Northern Ireland. Method(s): Data was gathered retrospectively using an excel database detailing patient demographics, appointment details and onward referrals generated from the clinic. Data was analysed for a set time period between the 01/12/2021 - 09/02/2022. The type of referral and the profession responsible were captured. Result(s): During the time period eight post ICU follow up clinics were completed. A total of 36 patient's attended (14 male and 22 female). Six appointments were attended virtually via MS Teams, 12 via telephone and 18 face-to-face. Twenty-three (64%) of the patients required at least one onward health referral. A total of 61 onward health referrals were generated from this population. Table 1 details the number of onwards referrals by speciality. Conclusion(s): Approximately 64% of patients who attended the post ICU follow up clinic, during a 10 week period, demonstrated unmet rehabilitation needs resulting in onward health referrals. This data supports the need for a post ICU follow up clinic at BHSCT to identify ongoing need, ensure transition of care to relevant services and optimise patient's physical and psychological outcomes. One limitation of this study is that not all recommended allied health professionals are commissioned for the clinic which may impact on the health needs identified. Future work should consider the impact of this and discussions regarding the need for a commissioned post ICU follow up clinic which is truly MDT for this patient population should be considered.

Mental health outcomes in physiotherapists in COVID-19 and non-cOVID-19 care units: a cross-sectional survey in Belgium

Background: Little is known about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on physiotherapists' mental health. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on physiotherapists' mental health in Belgium. Method(s): A total of 115 physiotherapists from 12 general hospitals in Brussels, working in COVID-19 care units (CCU) or non-COVID-19 care units (NCCU), participated in an electronic survey including validated measurement tools for PTSD, anxiety, insomnia and burnout. Descriptive analyses were performed to assess differences in mental health outcomes between physiotherapists who worked in a CCU and those who worked in an NCCU. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were also performed to assess risk factors for burnout. Result(s): Results showed significant levels of PTSD (9.6%), anxiety (33.9%), insomnia (40%) and burnout (33.9%) among participants. However, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups. It was also found that being isolated during the COVID-19 pandemic was a risk factor for burnout. Conclusion(s): Although no significant differences were found between the two groups, this study highlights a concerning rate of psychopathological symptoms among participants. Hospitals should therefore invest more time and resources into actions aiming at preserving the mental health of physiotherapists.Copyright © 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Similar symptoms at 3 months post discharge in ICU, COVID-19 ICU, and COVID-19 patients that received non-invasive ventilation in high dependency areas

Introduction: It is well documented that survivors of ICU admissions struggle to return to pre-admission level of function because of both physical and psychological burden. Current guidance therefore recommends a follow-up service to review patients 2-3 months post discharge from ICU [NICE 2009]. Prior to 2020 University Hospitals Bristol and Weston (UHBW) had no such service. With the increase in patient numbers seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, funding was received to provide a follow-up clinic to COVID-19 survivors. Spare clinic spaces were used for non COVID ICU patients. Objective(s): To review symptoms reported by patients in the following 3 groups, COVID-19 patients treated in ICU (COVID ICU), COVID-19 patients treated with continuous positive airway pressure ventilation in high dependency areas (COVID CPAP) and non COVID-19 ICU patients (ICU), at 2-3 months post discharge from UHBW. Method(s): Referred patients had an initial phone call at 8 weeks post discharge. The call identified both physical and psychological symptoms. Advice regarding recovery, signposting to resources and onwards referrals to appropriate specialities were provided. If symptoms indicated, patients would then be referred into the multidisciplinary team follow up clinic. Here they met with an intensivist, clinical psychologist, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, speech and language therapist and dietitian. Result(s): As Graph 1 shows all 3 patient groups had a wide variety of ongoing symptoms at 2-3 months post discharge. Fatigue was the most common symptom reported in all 3 groups. Breathlessness was the second most common symptom reported by COVID patients but was less frequently reported in the ICU population who had a variety of non-respiratory related reasons for admission. COVID ICU patients more commonly reported ongoing problems with their swallowing, voice and communication compared to the COVID CPAP group, most probably due to invasive ventilation. Psychological burden post critical illness was high in all 3 groups. More than 20% of all patients scored =10 on a PHQ-9 depression scale showing moderate to severe depression. More than 15% of all patients scored =10 on a GAD-7 showing moderately severe to severe anxiety. COVID ICU group had the highest incidence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This may be linked to the higher level of delirium we saw in this group, as a result of change in practice, such as full PPE and absence of visiting during the pandemic. ICU patients presented with a significantly higher percentage of physiotherapy needs. This is likely because patients with the longest and most complex ICU admissions were selected for the clinic. Sleep likely goes under reported in these results as we only began questioning specifically about this later on in the clinic. Conclusion(s): This data goes some way in supporting current literature that the rehabilitation needs of COVID ICU patients equal that of ICU patients (Puthucheary et al 2021). It also shows the need to follow up patients who receive advanced respiratory support outside of the ICU environment, as their symptoms, and therefore rehabilitation needs are very similar to ICU patients at 2-3 months post discharge.

ICU follow-up clinic provides the opportunity to recognise and address symptoms post critical illness, which may otherwise have been missed

Introduction: It is well documented that survivors of ICU admissions struggle to return to pre-admission level of function because of both physical and psychological burden. Current guidance therefore recommends a follow-up service to review patients 2-3 months post discharge [NICE 2009]. Prior to 2020 University Hospitals Bristol and Weston had no such service. With the increase in patient numbers seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, funding was received to provide a follow-up clinic to COVID-19 survivors. Objective(s): To provide a service that supports and empowers patients with their recovery from critical illness. Improving quality of life, speed of recovery and reducing longer term health care needs. Method(s): Referral criteria for the clinic included COVID-19 patients who received advanced respiratory support within intensive care and the high dependence unit. 8 weeks post discharge patients had a telephone appointment where ongoing symptoms could be identified. Advice around recovery, signposting to resources and onward referrals to appropriate specialities were provided. At 10 weeks post discharge patients had lung function tests and a chest X-ray which were reviewed by respiratory consultants. Based on the combination of these assessments, patients would be discharged or referred into the multidisciplinary team (MDT) follow-up clinic. The face to face clinic consisted of appointments with an intensivist, clinical psychologist, physiotherapist, and occupational therapist. Where needed patients would also be seen by a speech and language therapist or dietitian. Patients were seen only once in follow up clinic but again would be referred onto appropriate services within trust or the community, including but not exclusively community therapy services, secondary care services, SALT, dietetic or psychology clinics. Result(s): One of the key outcomes was the need for 147 onward referrals (an average of 1.13 referrals per patient). This included, 31 referrals to musculoskeletal physiotherapy outpatients for problems originating or made worse by their admission. 20 referrals to secondary care, including cardiology and ENT. 16 referrals to community occupational therapy, for provision of equipment, home adaptations and support in accessing the community. Subjectively, patient feedback was excellent. When asked what they felt was the most valuable thing they had taken from the clinic they reported: "Reassurance";"To know I'm not alone, others feel like this";"They listened to me and gave advice";"The ability to ask anything I wanted and the obvious kindness and support from all the clinicians I saw". Conclusion(s): Onward referral rates made by the follow-up clinic highlight the many issues faced by patients following discharge from ICU and hospital. With timely recognition and management, we can prevent a majority of these symptoms manifesting into chronic problems. This has the potential to lower the long-term burden on health care and improve quality of life for patients in both the short and long term. Without the follow-up clinic, these issues may have been missed or delayed. This reinforces the importance of the follow-up clinic and the need for ongoing investment.

Girft in Action: Advanced Practice Physiotherapist and Advanced Practice Nurse Expertise Provides Valuable Triage and Assessment Clinics for Non-Urgent Rheumatology Referrals

Background/Aims Rheumatology referrals classified as non-urgent/routine are commonly non-inflammatory conditions or medically non-urgent and can have significant waiting times for appointments. These waits were further escalated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Early intervention for noninflammatory conditions can be crucial to good outcomes and long wait-times can have significant adverse impacts while appropriate care pathways are determined. Recent UK GIRFT recommendations include using non-medical health professional expertise in assessment and management pathways to support right place, right time, right care. This study evaluated effectiveness, impacts and patient experiences of Advanced Practice Physiotherapist (APP) and Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) Triage and Assessment Clinics for routine new referrals. Methods The non-urgent/routine referral waiting list was e-triaged by a Rheumatology APP and APN supported by clinical record searches. Patients were contacted by telephone to update on clinical status and appointment requirements determined. Triage criteria were applied to determine new referrals suitable for APP and APN Rheumatology clinics, which included low likelihood of inflammatory disease or new referrals for known diagnosis/stable conditions. Clinics were undertaken with collocated Consultant clinical supervision. Assessment findings were discussed and management agreed, or seen if needed. With waiting list attrition, clinics were expanded to include Consultantdetermined stable condition reviews and follow-up reviews for nonsuspected inflammatory disease. Results At 01 July 2021, 214 new routine referrals were waiting a Consultant appointment (n=103 over 2yrs). Since service initiation, clinic outcomes to date include: 69% (n=243/358) new routine referrals discharged to GP or directed to right pathway with information, advice and self-management resources;8% (n=29) escalated to urgent;3% (11/358) with medical complexity remained on Consultant waitlist. Most common presentations seen included: Osteoarthritis (general or hand);Back and other spinal pain;Fibromyalgia;Persistent Fatigue and Widespread Pain;JHS/hEDS;Positive ANA without clinical features;Musculoskeletal conditions- other. To date, no patients have been re-referred and 329 new patient and 89 follow-up Consultant direct consultations have been spared. There is currently no wait-time for non-urgent/routine appointments. Patient experience feedback on the service has offered a 100% recommendation to continue and expressed highly positive experiences with the MDT approach. Patients value the breadth of expertise and care support, and the timely, thorough and professional service provided. Conclusion Rheumatology non-urgent/routine new referrals with low probability of underlying autoimmune conditions may be effectively and efficiently managed in a collaborative model using an advanced practice physiotherapist and nurse. This innovation has expanded a traditionally medical pathway to an MDT model utilising value-adding nonmedical expertise in service delivery. It has enhanced interdisciplinary learning and is a valued, collaborative approach to patient care. The initiative provides support to GIRFT recommendations of using an MDT skill-set to support improved patient access, service efficiencies and earlier intervention.

Developing Multidisciplinary Models of Care in Rheumatology at University College London Hospital: 18 Months of Learning from Conception to Delivery and Beyond

Background/Aims The COVID-19 pandemic has placed unprecedented pressures on NHS departments, with demand rapidly outstripping capacity. The British Society for Rheumatology 'Rheumatology Workforce: a crisis in numbers (2021)' highlighted the need to provide innovative ways of delivering rheumatology specialist care. At University College London Hospitals (UCLH) we created a rheumatology multidisciplinary team (MDT) clinic to meet rising demands on our service. The aims of the Rheumatology MDT clinic were to: reduce new appointment/follow-up waiting times, increase clinic capacity, incorporate musculoskeletal (MSK) point of care ultrasound, reduce number of hospital visits and add value to each clinic encounter. Methods We ran a 6-month pilot, supported by our outpatient transformation team, incorporating a Rheumatology Advanced Practice Physiotherapist (APP), Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) and MSK ultrasound within a Consultant clinic. The success of the pilot helped secure funding for a further 12 months. Over 18 months we have implemented: APP/Consultant enhanced triage - up to 40% of referrals were appropriate for APP assessment, including regional MSK problems and back pain. This increased capacity for consultant-led appointments. Standardisation of time-lapse between CNS and consultant follow-up appointments to ensure appropriate spacing between patient encounters. Facilitated overbooking of urgent cases afforded by additional capacity provided by the APP. MSK ultrasound embedded in the clinic template. 'Zoom' patient education webinars facilitated by MDT members and wider disciplines e.g. dietetics, to empower self-management and reduce the administrative burden of patient emails/phone calls occurring outside the clinic. Patient participation sessions and feedback to help shape the service. Results During the 6-month pilot we reduced our waiting time for follow-up appointments from 9 months to 2. We now have capacity to book 1-2 urgent cases each week. Pre-MDT the average wait from consultant referral to physiotherapist appointment was 55 days. The MDT allows for same day assessment (reducing 2-3 patient journeys a clinic) and where suitable, facilitates discharge or onwards referral to the appropriate service. A dedicated MDT CNS has shortened treatment times, reduced email traffic between CNS and consultant and allows for same day, joint decision-making resulting in fewer appointments. Zoom webinar feedback has been positive. Patients value the broad expertise of allied health professionals which supports self-management. Embedding ultrasound allows for same day diagnostics, decreased referrals to radiology and reduced hospital visits. Conclusion Our MDT model has reduced waiting lists, decreased treatment delays and cut hospital attendances. Point of care ultrasound allows for same day decision making and abolishes the cost and diagnostic delay associated with referrals to radiology or outsourced providers. Shared decision-making adds value to outpatient attendances, which is reflected in patients' positive feedback. The MDT model maximises the existing workforce skill set by enhancing the APP and CNS role, allowing patients immediate access to their expertise.

Online Mdt Patient Education for Early Inflammatory Arthritis

Background/Aims Patient education in early inflammatory arthritis (EIA) promotes understanding and engagement with treatment, empowering patients to use self-management in their long-term health condition. It is embedded in national guidance and audit. Individual appointments are time consuming, and groups sessions became impossible during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our education sessions have evolved to a monthly online meeting which aims to be engaging, effective and time efficient. Methods Face-to-face group education afternoons were previously embedded into our early arthritis pathway. Presentations and opportunities for questions were given by a rheumatology consultant, nurse, physiotherapist, podiatrist and occupational therapist. Sessions lasted 2 hours and local charity representatives attended. Group education sessions completely stopped with the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. This successful MDT model was moved to a monthly Microsoft Teams meeting and condensed to 1 hour. Sessions continue to consist of five short presentations, introduction to charity representatives and opportunity for questions. Following the session, all patients received links to videos of the talks for future reference, contact details for the MDT and local charities, and a link to download our local rheumatology self management app. Patients who are unable to attend also receive this content by email. Patient feedback was gathered through an online questionnaire. Results Attendance has increased over time with 75% of our new EIA patients now attending each month. Feedback from 16 patients rated 75% of all talks as extremely useful or useful. 89% are interested in attending future meetings. 93% had already used or plan to use our rheumatology self management app. Positive patient feedback included: ''the whole team were brilliant giving advice and answering questions'', ''nice to see the specialists' faces, and to get the feeling they really cared'', and ''a perfectly sensible and productive way to introduce all the options for help and support''. Some patients did not feel confident to ask questions in the meeting. Email and telephone advice lines were signposted. Attendance was increased by 40% by a short telephone reminder of the appointment. Conclusion An online meeting has proven to be a time efficient and effective way of providing multidisciplinary education and introducing self management. A short time investment from each MDT member gives breadth to the education. Inviting all newly diagnosed early arthritis patients and encouraging attendance by a short telephone call has maximised reach. Ensuring all patients are sent presentation videos to re-watch and the self referral details further facilitates self management. The format could easily be adapted to other patient education events.

Improving New Patient Appointment Utilisation in Rheumatology Advanced Practice Physiotherapy

Background/Aims Long Rheumatology waiting lists in the UK were further affected by the COVID-19 pandemic;resulting in negative impacts upon the timeliness and efficiency of patient care. The use of Advanced Practitioners within Rheumatology care pathways has been shown to be safe and effective;they can support the Rheumatology workforce and expedite care where patients are appropriately triaged to them. As part of a service provision change in a NHS Trust, an Advanced Practice Physiotherapist (APP) post was funded with the intent to harness these benefits. Initial utilisation of the APP appointments within the Rheumatology provision was found to be low and could be improved. A Quality Improvement (QI) Project was initiated, with the aim to increase APP appointment utilisation to at least 85% over a period of four months, and for at least 75% of these appointments to contain patients who had been appropriately triaged. Methods The 'Model for Improvement' was chosen as the QI approach. The project was led by an APP. Firstly, a stakeholder analysis was performed to identify staff with influence and interest in the project. A root cause analysis found lack of awareness of triaging clinicians and challenges with booking processes as potential reasons for lowerthan- expected appointment utilisation. Change interventions were devised and tested over three Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycles. PDSA one developed communication with booking and triage staff to clarify these processes with them. PDSA two educated clinical staff about the APP role, triage criteria and the booking procedures confirmed in PDSA one. PDSA three focused upon sustaining change by reinforcement of the topics established in PDSA two among staff. Outcome measures used were the percentage of available APP appointments utilised per week, and the percentage of these which contained patients who were appropriately triaged. Results APP appointment utilisation increased from a mean of 22% pre-project to 61% during the change intervention period. Sixty-three patients were seen over the 17-week change intervention period;of which 86% had been appropriately triaged. Data showed that 70% of the patients directed to the APP were managed by them (24% discharged and 46% reviewed). Of the remaining patients, 13% were followed up by a Rheumatologist, 12% did not attend and 5% had an alternative outcome such as awaiting advice. Conclusion This QI project led to an improvement in Rheumatology care provision locally. Engagement with support staff, education of clinical staff and implementation of clear standard operating procedures improved the utilisation of the Rheumatology APP resource. Results suggest that the APP role was effective locally in managing appropriately triaged patients, without a negative effect on patient care or other services. Continuing to improve utilisation will support management of the Rheumatology waiting list and improve patient care.

Understanding First Contact Physiotherapists Experiences of Remote Consultations in Primary Care

Background/Aims First Contact Physiotherapists (FCPs) assess, diagnose and manage patients presenting with musculoskeletal disorders in primary care, without the need for prior GP consultation. Prior to COVID-19 almost every consultation was conducted in-person. Since the pandemic, many consultations are now undertaken remotely, a trend that is set to continue in line with the 'Digital first' strategy which seeks to enhance patient access to appointments. This aim of this study was to explore FCP views of remote consultations and how this impacted their role satisfaction and wellbeing. Methods This mixed methods two phase study consisted of an online survey investigating distributed via professional networks and through social media. The phase one survey explored consultation methods;levels of training;challenges and benefits;and a stress appraisal. Data were analysed descriptively. Respondents were invited to take part in phase two which included a semi-structured interview to gain an in-depth understanding of FCPs lived experience of remote consultation ways of working. Transcripts were thematically analysed. Results The online survey received n=109 responses from UK-based FCPs. Data revealed that despite the 'Digital First' push for continued remote consultations, the majority of FCPs (62%) used them for less than a quarter of their appointment slots. Whilst recognising that many patients found this format convenient, FCPs highlighted their own stress levels, citing poor efficacy, anxiety of misdiagnosis, feelings of isolation and increased administrative workload. Nearly two thirds (66%) of respondents had not received any training in how to conduct effective remote consultations. Follow-up interviews with n=16 FCPs highlighted coping strategies including following up with an in-person consultation and directing patients to other community health and wellbeing resources. In areas of high socioeconomic deprivation and poor health literacy additional problems associated with communication difficulties, poor IT access and capability, and digital poverty were all cited. Conclusion Remote consultations may offer a convenient alternative for some patients. FCP responses suggest that the continued offer of remote consultation is decreasing now pandemic restrictions have been lifted, despite the push for continued digital working practices. The perceived lack of efficacy, and fear of missing important diagnostic information means that many FCPs are either returning to in-person consultation or following up with a second face-to-face assessment resulting in potential service inefficiencies. Additional challenges were identified in areas of high deprivation and low health literacy, and the value of this consultation format needs to be considered in this context. Future work should focus on the training and support needs of FCP staff who are engaging with remote working to ensure clinical effectiveness and staff wellbeing.

Piloting and evaluating the impact of specialist, online exercise programs on self-reported measures of health and exercise perceptions in adults with cystic fibrosis

Background: The benefits of physical training on exercise capacity, pulmonary functioning, and health-related quality of life for people with cystic fibrosis (CF) is well documented [1], meaning it is currently considered part of standard CF care to encourage a physically active lifestyle [2,3]. COVID-19 limited opportunities for people with CF to undergo structured exercise programs in the hospital, gym, or leisure center. To address this, we launched three progressive on-demand exercise programs on Beam (a specialist online exercise, education and wellbeing platform for the CF community, www.beamfeelgood.com) aimed at varying disease severity and baseline fitness levels. Each 12-session program was curated by a CF physiotherapist and designed to build strength and cardiovascular fitness, improve CF symptom management, and increase confidence to exercise. Participants were offered remote coaching to support completion of the program, including email and text support, and joint workouts. Here,we look at the impact of this program on self-reported measures of health and exercise perceptions. Method(s): Adults with CFwere invited via social media to participate in one of three Getting Started exercise programs on Beam. Participants selfselected the program that was most suited to them based on their disease severity and current fitness levels, as outlined in Table 1. Participants were asked to complete pre- and post-program surveys evaluating their general health, emotional wellbeing, appetite, sleep, motivation, enjoyment, confidence, and time and limitations to exercise on a five-point scale. Result(s): Between November 2021 and March 2022, of 71 people signed up for a Getting Started program, 36 completed a minimum of one class, and 16 completed the entire 12-sessions in a program. Of the 16 who(Table Presented) Audience and aims of the three Beam programs completed a program, 75% felt more motivated, 68% felt fitter, 75% felt stronger, and 65.5% were happier. All said their enjoyment of exercise was the same or more than before (37.5% saying they enjoyed it more), and 43.7% said they became more confident. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion(s): This work suggests that CF-specific online exercise programs have the potential to increase strength and cardiovascular fitness levels as well as motivation, confidence, and enjoyment to exercise in adults with CF, although these outcomes were self-reported, and a research trial to evaluate impact on clinical outcome measures is warranted. Additionally, further research and service development is required to improve the programs and increase activation and completion of the exercise programs with greater consideration of behavior change interventions.Copyright © 2022, European Cystic Fibrosis Society. All rights reserved

One-year outcomes following rehabilitation for chronic hip-related groin pain: ancillary analysis of a pilot randomized clinical trial

Purpose: Rehabilitation to address modifiable factors associated with chronic hip-related groin pain (CHRGP) may lead to reduced pain and improved function, yet little is known about its effectiveness. We assessed the preliminary effects of two interventions that target two distinct mechanisms, sensory disturbances and abnormal movement patterns. Sensory disturbances such as peripheral and central sensitization may contribute to pain persistence long after initial injury. Joint mobilization (JtMob) may impart a neurophysiological response within the nervous system that results in pain reduction and improved mobility. Abnormal movement patterns may create altered mechanical stresses on hip joint structures, resulting in pain and activity limitations. Movement pattern training (MoveTrain) may improve movement patterns and thus patient function. Method(s): Patients with CHRGP, 18-40, were enrolled. Assessments included self-report questionnaires, clinical exam, and quantitative sensory testing. Outcomes included the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), a patient-reported outcome;frontal plane kinematics of hip, pelvis, and trunk during single leg squat;and pain pressure threshold (PPT) assessed at the anterior groin of the most bothersome hip and dominant thenar eminence (local and generalized pressure hypersensitivity, respectively). Patients were randomized to JtMob or MoveTrain in a 1:1 ratio stratified by sex and HOOS Symptoms. Treatment for both groups included 10 individualized visits over 12 weeks with a trained physical therapist (PT);assessment of patient goals and education which focused on patient-specific tasks reported by the patient to be symptom-producing;instruction in a home exercise program (HEP);and handouts that provided education, description and benefits of assigned treatment and instructions for HEP. The key element of JtMob was PT-provided manual techniques using specific criteria to determine the joint mobilization techniques and parameters used for each patient. The patient's symptom report to each technique was monitored and if indicated, the technique modified according to our outlined procedures. The HEP included flexibility exercises. The key element of MoveTrain was task-specific instruction to correct abnormal movement patterns displayed during daily and patient-specific tasks. For example, hip adduction was minimized during a step descent. The HEP included repeated practice of modified tasks. Task difficulty was progressed based on each patient's performance. Immediately after treatment completion, patients returned for follow up assessment. To assess treatment sustainability after the active treatment phase, we collected HOOS at 6 and 12 months (extended follow-up), and kinematics and PPT at 12 months. Data from patients who provided any data after baseline were analyzed with a repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) with baseline value as a covariate, patient as a random effect, and an autoregressive covariance structure. After adjusting for baseline, the between-group difference in change from post-treatment to each extended follow-up results from pre-planned statistical contrasts in a RM-ANOVA that includes main effects for treatment group, visit and the group by visit interaction. The within-group treatment effect at each extended follow-up was calculated by subtracting the earlier time point from the later follow-up within each treatment group. Dependent samples t-tests were used to assess the degree of within-group change. Result(s): Demographics and outcome data are provided in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Thirty-three patients with CHRGP were randomized and 29 (88%) provided post-treatment data. Four patients did not complete treatment or post-treatment testing (3 due to COVID pandemic, 1 lost to follow up);6 patients did not complete 12 month laboratory testing (due to pandemic), but did complete 12 month questionnaires. Previously, we reported that both groups reported clinically important improvements in HOOS subscales and MoveTrain group improved hip and pelvis kinematics immediately after treatment compared to baseline. After adjusting for baseline, there were no between-group differences in change in outcomes between post-treatment and extended follow-up when comparing JtMob and MoveTrain, indicating that treatment effects immediately post-treatment were maintained at 12 months after treatment completion. Conclusion(s): Our preliminary findings suggest that 12 weeks of JtMob or MoveTrain, may result in improvements in patient-reported pain and function and these effects may persist 12 months after treatment completion. A future, larger trial to definitively assess the efficacy of JtMob and MoveTrain and identify factors associated with long-term outcomes will improve our ability to develop treatment strategies for people with CHRGP. [Formula presented] [Formula presented]Copyright © 2023

Knowledge, attitude and adherence to standard precautions among frontline clinical physiotherapists during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey

Purpose: To investigate the knowledge of pathology and prevention of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), attitude towards clinical practice, and adherence to standard precautions among clinical physiotherapists during the pandemic. Material(s) and Method(s): A snowballing method was used to recruit physiotherapists (across 53 countries) who responded to a newly designed and validated survey on the participants’demographics, knowledge of COVID-19, attitude, practices, and standard precaution adherence during the pandemic. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Cronbach’s Alpha, Pearson’s correlation, and ANOVA. Result(s): All participants (n = 2550, 100%) were knowledgeable on COVID-19 symptomatology. However, only (n = 312, 12.2%) were actively involved in the management of confirmed cases. The percentage score of participants’knowledge regarding COVID-19 pathology, and prevention, their attitude, and adherence to standard precautions averaged 77.73 ±10.11, 89.70 ±9.26, 77.44 ±7.04, and 61.59 ±16.63, respectively. Knowledge about COVID-19 pathology differed significantly across demographic variables (p <0.001, Ƞ2 ≤0.07). Most participants (n = 1936, 75.9%) reported an inadequate supply of personal protective equipment (PPE). Conclusion(s): Participants had good knowledge of COVID-19 pathology and a positive attitude towards safe clinical practice. However, adherence to standard precautions was suboptimal due to inadequate infectious disease training and PPE supply.Copyright © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &Francis Group.

Comparison between in-person and remote assessment of four field tests for people with chronic lung diseases

Introduction: COVID-19 pandemic has driven an abrupt shift from centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation to home-based or telerehabilitation models in order to safely deliver this important treatment. However, functional capacity assessment is still carried out with in-person supervision. Aim(s): To compare remote and in-person assessment of four field tests for patients with chronic lung diseases. Method(s): People with chronic respiratory diseases underwent timed up and go test (TUG), 5-repetitions sit-to-stand test (5-repStS), 1-minute STS (1-minStS), and modified incremental step test (MIST). Tests were carried out at participants' home with in-person or remote (Skype or WhatsApp) assessment, in random order. During the remote assessment, the physiotherapist was at the pulmonary rehabilitation centre. The order of the tests was also randomized and was the same for in-person and remote supervision. Each test was performed twice and the test with best performance was used for comparison between remote and in-person supervision. A kit containing a finger pulse oximeter, tape measure, and a step was provided. Pair t -test expressed as mean difference (95% CI), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 2:1), and Bland-Altman method were used for analysis. Result(s): Forty-four participants (23 COPD, 18 bronchiectasis, three cystic fibrosis, FEV 1 47 +/- 19%, 56 +/- 15 years old) were assessed. There was no difference between in-person and remote supervision for all tests (TUG 0.04(-0.2-0.2) s, 5-repStS: 0.3(-0.1-0.7) s, 1-minStS: -0.9 (-1.9-0.1) repetitions, and MIST: -3.1 (-9.9-3.7) steps). High reproducibility was observed by ICC (95% CI) (TUG: 0.94 (0.89-0.97), 5-repStS: 0.96 (0.92-0.98), 1-minStS: 0.87 (0.77-0.93), and MIST: 0.94 (0.88-0.96). Limits of agreement were narrow for TUG (-0.8-1.7), 5-repStS (-2.3-2.9), and 1-minStS (-7.4-5.5), but wide for MIST (-46-40). Conclusion(s): Remote assessment provides similar results to in-person assessment for four field tests commonly used in people with chronic lung diseases.

Validity and test-retest reliability of field tests carried out by teleassessment of children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to the rapid adoption of alternative evaluation methods for measuring functional capacity in people with cystic fibrosis, who are at high risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes. Teleassessment may be an alternative to conducting in-person field tests in this population. Objectives : To investigate the validity, reliability, and safety of field tests conducted by teleassessment in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis. Method(s): Participants underwent three functional tests: 3-min step test (3-min ST), 1-min sit-to-stand test (1-min StS), and a timed up-and-go (TUG) test performed in their homes with in-person and remote assessment, in random order. During the remote assessment, the physiotherapist was at the pulmonary rehabilitation center. The order of the tests was randomized and the same in both assessments. For validity, main outcomes were compared between in-person and remote supervision by Wilcoxon test for 3-min ST and TUG, expressed as median (IQR), and pair t -test for 1-min StS, expressed as mean (SD). For test-retest reliability (test 1 vs. test 2) of the remote tests, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 2,1) and Bland-Altman analysis were used. Result(s): Thirty-two participants (15 boys, 11 +/- 3 years, FEV 1 73 +/- 17% of predicted) were included. No significant difference was observed between in-person and remote supervision (3-min ST: 88 [83.5-90] vs. 88 [82.5-90] steps;1-min StS: 33(7) vs. 32(8) repetitions;TUG: 6.5 [5.6-8.0] vs. 6.6 [5.7-7.9] s). Test-retest of remote supervision demonstrated very good to excellent reliability for all field tests (ICC (95%CI) 3-min ST: 0.88 [0.65-0.95], 1-min StS: 0.86 [0.67-0.94], and TUG: 0.76 [0.41-0.89]). Mean difference (lower-upper limits of agreement) were 3-min-ST: -3.6 (-13.9-6.7) steps, 1-min StS: -1.9 (-8.6-4.7) repetitions, and TUG: 0.8 (-1.4-2.9) s. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion(s): In children and adolescent with cystic fibrosis, 3-min ST, 1-min StS, and TUG are valid, reliable and safe when carried out by teleassessment.

Impact of a Structured Rehabilitation Program on the Functional Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Tertiary-Care Center Experience

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is an invaluable whole gland treatment for intermediate, high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). However, a non-negligible proportion of these patients still harbour urinary incontinence and erectile disfunction after surgery. To assess the efficacy of our rehabilitation program in these patients. METHOD(S): A two arm, retrospective study on patients who underwent a RARP at a single institution in two pre-specified time intervals, namely March-July 2019 (study group) and March-July 2020 (control group), was conducted. Patients in the study group underwent a specific rehabilitation program, consisting of counseling with a prostate case-manager, an urologist and a physiotherapist, therefore starting pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) at least 1-month before RARP. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic restrictions, this structured program was not delivered to the control group. The primary endpoint was the assessment functional outcomes at 30 days, 3 and 6 months after surgery. Continence recovery was defined as no use of pad, while erectile function (EF) recovery was defined as erection sufficient for an intercourse. Secondary endpoints included the following: surgical waiting time (SWT;period from prostate biopsy to surgery), biochemical recurrence (BCR) and/or imaging evidence of progression. RESULT(S): We included 249 patients, 136 (54.6%) in the study group and 113 (45.4%) in the control group. At 30 days after RARP, 49 (36.0%) patients in the study group were completely continent, and 6 (4.4%) had preserved EF as compared to 8 (7.1%) and 0 (0%) in the control group (p<0.001 and p=0.072 respectively). At 3 months, 131 (96.3%) were continent and 30 (22.1%) patients had recovery of EF in the study group, compared with 77 (68.14%) and 9 (8.0%) in the control group (p<0.001). Finally, at 6 months, 134 (98.5%) were continent and 50 (36.8%) had erection sufficient for intercourse in the study group, as compared with 96 (85.0%) and 19 (16.8%) in the control group (p<0.001). Median SWT was 2.9 (2.5-3.1) in 2019 and 5.8 (5.0-7.0) in 2020, (p<0.001). Median follow-up was 42 months (43-44) in the study group vs 32 (31-32) in the control group. No significant differences were observed in the proportion of patients experiencing BCR or imaging disease progression (8.1% vs 2.7%, p>=0.05). CONCLUSION(S): Our rehabilitation program is an valuable tool to enhance functional outcomes in patients undergoing RARP. Further prospective studies are still needed to confirm our results.

Survey of Home Cleaning Practices With Noninvasive Ventilation Equipment

Purpose:Home noninvasive ventilation (NIV) equipment is often observed to be dirty, potentially increasing patients' risk of respiratory infection. This study aimed to describe the cleaning practices of home NIV patients. Method(s):This single-site, cross-sectional, observational study surveyed 100 patients from the respiratory failure clinic regarding cleaning instructions, cleaning habits, barriers, and motivators to cleaning. Open-ended responses were analyzed with basic content analysis and closed categorical responses with frequencies and percentages. Result(s):Of 100 participants, 77% responded. Cleaning instructions most commonly recalled included cleaning with soapy water for masks (26/47, 55%), head straps (19/47, 40%), and tubing (21/47, 45%);vinegar solution for humidifiers (9/39, 23%);and replacing filters (14/39, 36%). Fourteen respondents reported barriers to cleaning, including forgetfulness (7/14, 50%) and physical difficulties (6/14, 43%). Commonly reported cleaning practices included soapy water to soak masks (28/77, 36%) and tubing (35/77, 46%), weekly masks (34/77, 44%) and tubing cleaning (29/77, 38%), vinegar solution to clean humidifiers for the 36 humidifier users (15/36, 44%), monthly humidifier cleaning (13/36, 36%), and monthly filter cleaning/replacement (36/77, 47%). Conclusion(s):Few respondents could recall specific instructions about when and how to clean their equipment. Many reported routine cleaning, with varied methods and frequencies. Our results will inform future NIV equipment cleaning educational package design.Copyright © Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Section, APTA.

Aggression, mini-aggression, and abuse against health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic

Introduction: COVID-19 pandemic brought multiple negative consequences that go beyond the direct damage caused by the disease and that affect health systems as well. Complaints of attacks against health care workers became frequent and concerning. The objective of this survey was to characterize the frequency and type of violent behavior against front-line professionals in Latin America. Material(s) and Method(s): A cross-sectional electronic survey was carried out between January 11th to February 28th, 2022. Different health care workers from Latin America who have been delivering care at least from March 2020, regardless of whether they assist or not patients with COVID- 19 were included. A non-probabilistic snowball sampling was performed, and the survey was Results: The survey was responded by 3,544 participants from 19 countries (Figure 1);58.5% were women, and the mean age was 41.9+/-11 years. The 70.8% were doctors, 16% nurses, 3.4% physiotherapists, and the remaining 9.8% had other functions within the health team. About 85.1% of physicians were specialists: 33.9% were cardiologists, 14.4% were intensivists or emergency physicians, 10.9% had some surgical specialty, 7.7% were pediatricians or related subspecialties, and the remaining 33.1% had other specialties. The 36.3% and 28.8% worked in public and private practice respectively, the remaining worked in both. Direct and regular care to COVID-19 patients was provided by 74.7% of all contestants. Among the participants, 54.8% reported acts of violence: 95.6% suffered verbal violence, 11.1% physical violence, and 19.9% other types. 39.5% of respondents experienced it at least once a week. The acts of violence involved patients' relatives (32%), or patients together with their relatives (35.1%). The victims rated the stress level of these events with an average of 8.2+/-1.8 points (scale from 1 to 10). Approximately half of the health personnel who suffered an assault experienced psychosomatic symptoms after the traumatic event (Figure 2). Among the victims of violence, 56.2% considered changing their care tasks, and 33.6% abandoning their profession. However, only 23% of the health personnel attacked stated that they had made some type of legal action regarding these acts. In a logistic regression model, doctors (OR 1.95, p<0.01), nurses (OR 1.77, p=0.001), and administrative staff (OR 3.20, p<0.01) suffered more violence than other health workers. Women more frequently suffered violence (OR 1.56, p<0.01), as well as those who worked with patients with COVID-19 (OR 3.59, p<0.01). Conversely, a lower probability of violence was observed at older ages (OR 0.96, p<0.01). Conclusion(s): We detected a high prevalence of violence against health personnel in Latin America during the current pandemic. Those caring for COVID-19 patients, younger staff, and women were found to be more vulnerable. It is imperative to develop strategies to mitigate these acts and their repercussions on the health team. (Figure Presented) .

Dutch Myositis Working Group (Dmwg)

Introduction. The poster of the Dutch Myositis Working Group (DMWG) aims to inform people about her goals, activities and ambitions. The group is run by seven patients, representing all types of myositis, supported by Spierziekten Nederland, the umbrella patient organization for neuromuscular disorders in The Netherlands and 4 myositis specialists as medical advisors. Chair: Ingrid de Groot. Contact email: myositis@spierziekten.nl Goals and ambitions of the Dutch myositis working group: * I n collaboration with medical advisors to provide information about IIM (idiopathic inflammatory myopathies) or myositis to newly diagnosed patients and their families: IIM types, symptoms, diagnosis, (new) treatment options, prognosis, inform them about the myositis expertise centres etc. * To connect and support people with all types of IIM: dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), Anti Synthetase Syndrome (ASyS), immune mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), overlap myositis. * To raise awareness of myositis among the public, health care professionals and researchers, pharmaceutical companies? * To collaborate with clinicians, researchers and funds on a national and international level with the aim to improve (clinical) care and research. * To stimulate and participate in the development and conducting of clinical trials. * To collaborate with myositis working groups and patient organisations abroad. * To represent the patient perspective within in the Myositis Network Netherlands and (inter)national myositis study groups. * Patient advocacy. Activities and services: * In person or online meetings aiming to offer moral support and an opportunity to share experiences, concerns etc. or just to socialize. Three times a year we organize separate meetings for people with IBM, for people with other IIM and for caregivers. * Website updates on treatment, guidelines, (inter)national research, activities and actualities (e.g. Covid situation). * Supply patients with brochures for GP/ family doctor, physiotherapist etc. * Online (secured) platform for members. * Annual patient conference with diagnosis specific scientific programs. * Monthly newsletters: these are personalized which means they contain mainly news on the receivers type of IIM (e.g. IBM or ASyS) and information on general topics concerning all people with IIM or neuromuscular disorder. * In person meetings and / or online webinars on general topics e.g. living with a chronic condition, work, pain, fatigue. * Annual meetings with medical advisors: the working group pays a visit to all medical advisors in their respective hospitals. * Representation at (inter)national conferences. * Representation in projects such as guidelines development. * Collaboration in (inter)national studies leading to enrolling Dutch patients, researchers and clinicians in multi-centre studies, (co-) authorships in publications and to presentations during conferences (Treat NMD, IMACS, MNN). * To advise and recommend on research proposals from patient perspective. * To advise decision makers on continuation of expert centres from patient perspective. Collaborations: * Myositis Network Netherlands: patient representation on the board. * OMERACT (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology): Patient Research Partner of the Myositis Working Group. * IMACS (International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group): steering committee member of Exercise & Rehabilitation Group, led by Helene Alexanderson, ass.prof PhD, RPT). * ENMC (European Neuromuscular Centre): patient representation in myositis workshops. * EULAR (European League against Rheumatism): member of PARE and Patient Research Partner. * GCOM. * ERN - NMD (European Reference Network for Neuromuscular Diseases): member of NMD working group led by em. prof. dr. Marianne de Visser. * Patient organizations for people living with myositis . We are in this together Since myositis is a (very) rare disease, the 'myositis community' is a small one although we're happy to say that it is expanding quite rapidly. Through our inte sive involvement in several national and international studies and research projects we now have close contacts with many myositis experts across the globe, which makes it easier to keep up with actualities and developments concerning research, treatment etc. and to disseminate this knowledge to our members. This helps us to inform, support and advocate for the Dutch people living with myositis and their families and at the same time it offers opportunities to give something back: by sharing with the research community and clinicians our experiential knowledge of the consequences of myositis on everyday life. That way we can contribute to more meaningful research. We can only go forward if we do this together! That is why we are very ambitious in our efforts to contribute to myositis research. Here we list our collaborative efforts: * In 2019 the Myositis Network Netherlands of clinicians and researchers with expertise in IIM was established in which the DMWG is representing the patient perspective by a member on the board. * In OMERACT Myositis Working Group a member of the DMWG is one of the two Patient Research Partners and as such an equal partner of this study aiming to define a set of core patient reported domains with regard to the quality of life and respective instruments for use in IIM. The involvement of the DMWG has led to the opportunity for Dutch patients to participate in Delphi surveys and to an opportunity for Dutch myositis clinics to collaborate in the longitudinal study that emerged from this. * The IMACS network is an important part of our international network. One of our DMWG members is member of the Executive Committee of the Exercise & Rehabilitation Group and as such can facilitate for Dutch patients to become involved in the current study with the ultimate objective to develop recommendations for exercise in all types of IIM. * Members of the DMWG participated in several ENMC workshops on IIM as patient representatives and will continue to do so in the future. * Through a PARE membership in EULAR and membership of the study group of 'collaborative research' the DMWG hopes to raise awareness of myositis within the influential EULAR community and to speak up on behalf of the patients in Europe living with IIM. * One of our members is member of the GCOM committee responsible for the patient program of GCOM and shares the ambitions of this GCOM committee to increase the involvement of patients in this very important IIM conference. * One DMWG member joined the ERN- Neuromuscular Disease group and as such represents the people with IIM living throughout Europe. * DMWG has ambitions to empower people living with IIM and to connect with them, crossing borders by doing so. We have close and amicable relationships with patient organisations in Australia, Czech Republic, Germany, Sweden, UK and USA. * Empowering patients is one of our goals and we accomplished this for instance in Sweden. On invitation by prof. dr. Ingrid Lundberg our chair visited the Karolinska Institute, spent a week with their myositis team and in return was one of the speakers on the annual patient meeting and helped the Swedish patients establish their own myositis working group.